<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gwyneth&#8217;s Husband Involved in Paparazzi Scuffle (Video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/</link>
	<description>The Not So Pretty Side of Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:44:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/comment-page-1/#comment-6956</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/#comment-6956</guid>
		<description>Chris Martin was wrong.  The paparazi did not treat Gwyneth with &#039;disrespect&#039;.  If anything, he spoke in a way that was solicitous and kind.  She is a celebrity and they have to expect some pictures.  Chris was not a hero here, just trying to get away with being a bully.  The guy with the video camera called it right.  

G. did the right thing being composed and just getting in the car.  Also good though that she was not being swarmed the way Britney Spears is.  In that case, I would have sided with Chris.  There are lines in both cases.  In this instance, Mr. Martin crossed it.

To have such contempt for photographers who are not acting in a dangerous out of control way (balance in the eco-system) is bad manners for the privilege of being considered a celebrity and worthy of public interest and a photograph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Martin was wrong.  The paparazi did not treat Gwyneth with &#8216;disrespect&#8217;.  If anything, he spoke in a way that was solicitous and kind.  She is a celebrity and they have to expect some pictures.  Chris was not a hero here, just trying to get away with being a bully.  The guy with the video camera called it right.  </p>
<p>G. did the right thing being composed and just getting in the car.  Also good though that she was not being swarmed the way Britney Spears is.  In that case, I would have sided with Chris.  There are lines in both cases.  In this instance, Mr. Martin crossed it.</p>
<p>To have such contempt for photographers who are not acting in a dangerous out of control way (balance in the eco-system) is bad manners for the privilege of being considered a celebrity and worthy of public interest and a photograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiimy Joe Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/comment-page-1/#comment-6941</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiimy Joe Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bittenandbound.com/2008/01/18/gwyneths-husband-involved-in-paparazzi-scuffle-video/#comment-6941</guid>
		<description>Good for Chris. People need to start running these asshole paparassi down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Chris. People need to start running these asshole paparassi down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
