Monster of Montauk (Photo)

beware_sign-770916.jpg

I have been reading about this unidentified monster that washed up on shore in New York at a beach in Montauk, Long Island and frankly it has been bugging me. Scientists have yet to identify what the creature is so they are calling it the Monster of Montauk.

At first glance the photo looks like a turtle without a shell. Did I mention that it has claws? Another theory is that an animal testing facility close by may have undertaken an experiment that went very, very wrong.

I couldn’t bring myself to put the photo at the top of the story because it is ugly and I can only look at it briefly. It is clearly the stuff that nightmares of made of……so if you really want to see what all the fuss is about we dare you to glance down.

What do you think it is – send us your thoughts.

UPDATE:  May 14, 2009 – Another sighting, video and photo here.

Montauk Monster

Related Articles:

9 Responses to “Monster of Montauk (Photo)”

  1. You can’t take a shell off a turlte and find a fully formed body underneath, that is the work of cartoons. Turtles do not have skin on their bodies under their shells, their spine is actually part of the shell itself. If you took the shell off a trutle the only skin left would be on the legs, head, and tail…the body would just be exposed muscle tissue and organs. They don’t have a fully formed body and a removeable shell like on looney tunes!

  2. With Global warming going on and the Ice shelfs breaking off and melting… wouldnt it be funny if this creature was frozen in the ice for thousands of years??? The Artic and northern Ice shelfs have been Frozen for Hundreds maybe thousands of years.

    The Frozen Creature has Washed Ashore.

  3. It’s a fake! Looks like a roasted pig that some one did some cosmetic work on, posed it, then snapped a pic. One pic? Come on, you come across something like that for real, you’re gonna fill the card on your digi camera for proof that it IS real! Don’t pee down my back and tell me it’s raining, it’s the “Feejee Mermaid” hoax by P.T. Barnum in 1942 all over again! Google it folks, and stop being so gullible!

  4. I think that it being one pictures is not entirely reliable. If you look closely at the ‘beak’ you can tell that it is actually the remains of canine teeth. Also, You can see a few scraps of fur on the wrist and neck. I think this is a picture of a decomposed carnivoire, like a racoon or dog. If this picture is indeed credible.

  5. Hey Jamie,
    The northern polar ice caps had the hardest freeze last year in decades. The glaciers have not retreated for a couple years and will likely grow again this winter. It’s a common mistake since the Global Warming friendly MSM retards only report warm temperatures and disregard normal or cold temps.

    That poor lil’ creature is a decomposing dog. I hope he went without pain or fear.

  6. it might be a raccoon because the person two above me is right, it cant be a sea turtle the back is perfectly fine. but i dont think that it was an ice creature, steve. it might be a dog that some sick person tortured and tied its front paws together, i mean look at the hands it looks like someone tied them together so that it couldnt move them and drowne the thing and then it became like sea glass and shriveled up. ITS POSSIBLE, and its not fake! i lived in montauk and i know montauk beaches, theyv been looking into the montauk monster for a long time!

  7. Overly intoxicated, Spuds McKenzie fell off a Bud light party barge.
    It’s an English Bull Terrier

  8. ok in 2010 the planets aline the devil has sent a test subject to see if the underworld can live with us…so it a demon

  9. frozen???
    that picture will give me nightmares….
    was there a creature like that before???
    like during the ice age???
    gah! o.O”

Leave a Reply