The Great Cougar Hunt G4 Video Triggers Lawsuit

Cougar Crossing

Hot spot Chapter 8 in Agoura Hills in southern California was the trigger point that caused three women to launch a lawsuit.  The trio went to the club in 2007 and ended up being video taped and featured on a G4 program called Attack of the Show in a story segment entitled “The Great Cougar Hunt”.

The lawsuit defines the word cougar as “a sexually cunning 35+ female who is on the hunt for a much younger energetic male”.    The suit further specifies that the women were portrayed as “older women who were attempting to pick up younger men at Chapter 8, which was described on the show as a ‘world famous cougar hot spot’.  The segment describes cougars as the easiest and most ravenous prey for younger men.”

The women in question claim that they were filmed without their consent and were NOT on the hunt for younger men – or any men for that matter.  The lawsuit was emphatic in stating that “the Plaintiffs do not date younger men at all.”  In fact, the show was so outrageous and offensive to the three women that they are suing G4 and the two hosts of the show in excess of $1 million.

Check out the video that sparked the entire episode here.

Source – TMZ

Related Articles:

4 Responses to “The Great Cougar Hunt G4 Video Triggers Lawsuit”

  1. I’m suing every young women who tried to pick me up that wanted me to be their “Sugar Daddy”. I could use a cool million.

  2. That is funny JMillion, LOL. However, no one would be belittling you, or comparing you with a large flesh eating animal in a negative context if you did pick up such chicas, and certainly no one would fault you for desiring them. If anything, your mates would envy and high-five you.

    Who has cougar nightmares? It is either older men, or younger women. They are trying to make these attractive women into monsters that no man would want, a comforting thought. Tough nuts, I say.

    As for those women, the case sounds silly until you realize this video was ‘published’ and affected their reputations and so self-image and self-confidence, which clearly was the aim… and by extension other such women, who should just ‘clear off, cut their hair, get fat, take Prozac, commit suicide and die’.

    They were not asked to be filmed for that program and did not give permission. They were stigmatized and humiliated when there was no reason to be whether they were looking to meet someone attractive or not.

    As such they were socially victimized, and they are private citizens, not celebrities. Those women did not need to explain or apologize for why they were there. You’d think one were talking about child molesters or Grendel’s mother. It makes me laugh. It’s very ugly sexism. Women live a long time now, longer than men. Many have education and money. They can bloody well choose an attractive mate they find desirable.

  3. Oh boy…well, if it wasn’t all a put-on (incl the current lawsuit), then these guys *did* cross a line. As previously noted, private citizens have a reasonable right to privacy when in public, unlike celebrities or well-known people (politicians, etc).

    If they had simply made them unidentifiable by blurring their faces, they could defend their actions (and save the rest of us from seeing that).

    There must’ve been better looking cougars in there!

  4. Are you kidding lol. They were in a public place they have no grounds where they would except confidentiality so thats it for their case. One of teh women shaked her butt for the camera and another was actually talking into a mic. Are you serious lol.

Leave a Reply